Assessment of Farmers Preference for Agricultural Extension Service Delivery in Bichi Local Government Area, Kano


Extension Delivery

How to Cite

Sani, U., & Abubakar, M.A. (2023). Assessment of Farmers Preference for Agricultural Extension Service Delivery in Bichi Local Government Area, Kano. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Environment and Social Sciences, 9(1), 176-185. Retrieved from


This study assessed farmer preference for agricultural extension services delivery in Bichi local
government area of Kano State, Nigeria. Multistage sampling technique was employed in the
selection farmers. The first stage involved purposive selection of three (3) ward due to
concentration of farmers working in group. The second stage involved simple random selection of
83 farmers, while snowball method was used and identified sixteen (16) extension agents working
in the area. The primary data was obtained using structured questionnaires. The data was analyzed
using descriptive and inferential (binary logic regression model) statistics. The result reveals the
approaches used by extension agents in their services delivery to be farmer group interaction
(87.5%) as well as training and visit (87.5%) approach. The services offered to farmers were proper
and recommended methods of fertilizer application (93.8%), use of improved seed (93.8%),
linking farmers with agro input dealers (93.8%), pre-season training (93.8%) conduct of
demonstration plots (93.8%) and dissemination of innovation that come along the way (100%).
The findings also show that educational status of the respondents has significant influence on
access (-0.715) and use (-0.764) of the extension services provided at one percent probability level
respectively while (42.2%) of farmers showed preference to advice rendered on proper and
recommended methods of fertilizer application. It is therefore concluded that farmer’s group
training and training and visit were the most approaches used by extension agents in their services
delivery with services delivered as effective to some while ineffective to others with most
preference to different methods of fertilizer application. It is therefore recommended that extension
service should be rendered as at when due putting in to consideration the need of the farmers.



Adejo P.E., OkwuO.Jand Ibrahim M.K (2012); Challenges and Prospects of privatization of
Agricultural Extension Delivery in Nigeria, journal of Agricultural Extension Rural
Development, volume 4 (5) pp 63-68
Bassey, J. I. (2012). PhD Seminar paper on pre and post- independence agricultural extension
approachesin Nigeria. Department of agricultural economics and extension, University of
Calabar, Nigeria.
Bawa, D. B., Ani, A. O. and Nuhu, H. S. (2009). Perception of privatization and
commercialization of agricultural extension services in Adamawa State, Nigeria. Eurasian
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 3(3): 375-380.
Mahmood, K.C. (2005); Analysis of Alternative Extension Approaches to Technology
Dissemination and its Utilization for Sustainable Agricultural Development. Faisaland,
Pakistan University of Agriculture.
Miller, R.L and Brewer, J.D (2003). AZ of social Research. SAGE Publication Ltd. Landon.
Musbahu, I.F (2017): Assessment of Extension Services among Rice Farming Household in
Bunkure L.G.A of Kano State, Nigeria.
National Population Commission (2006). International Household Survey Network.
Ogunlade, I., Oladele, O. I. and Babatunde, A. O. (2009). Farmers attitude to beneficiary funding
of extension services in Kwara State, Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, 26 (3): 215 220.
Ponniah, A., Puskur, R., Workneh, S and Hoekstra, D (2008); Concepts and Practices in
Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries. A source Book, Washington D.C,
International Food Policy Research Institute.


Download data is not yet available.